Nutritional and
Botanical Considerations in the Systemic Treatment of Cancer: 2006, 2010 Update
Dana Myatt, N.M.D. and Mark Ziemann, R.N.
Overview
Some
types of cancer are consistently responsive to conventional medical
treatment, especially those amenable to surgical intervention when diagnosed
early. Cytotoxic therapy is helpful in selected instances. For most cancers,
especially those advanced beyond Stage I or II, conventional treatments that
evoke durable remissions are elusive and inconsistent. In many instances,
cytotoxic and radiation therapies end a patient’s life sooner than the
natural course of the disease would be expected to.
Alternative cancer therapies, while typically gentler and less inherently
dangerous, have also proven inconsistent for evoking durable remissions.
However, instances can be found where durable remissions and event apparent
cure have been obtained by unconventional and alternative treatments used as
stand-alone therapy. When used in conjunction with conventional treatments,
alternative therapies can sometimes potentiate the positive effects of
conventional therapy, mitigate the negative effects, or both.
The
questions we will examine in this presentation include:
I.)
Which alternative treatments are most effective
as the sole treatment for malignancy and when should they be used?
II.)
Which alternative treatments are most effective
as adjuncts to conventional therapy?
III.)
Which alternative treatments may be
contraindicated for adjunct cancer therapy?
A
careful review of the medical literature reveals that there are in fact
specific modes of action to explain when and why alternative treatments are
effective and when such treatments fail.
Cancer Cell Characteristics: Understanding the Enemy
Developing a cohesive and effective treatment strategy requires an
understanding of the behavior and biology of cancer cells. Although various
cancer types display unique behaviors, there are a number of characteristics
common to all solid tissue malignancies:
1.
Altered interactions with neighboring cells.
Unlike normal cells whose division stops when neighboring cells are
encountered, cancer cells continue to multiply with uncontrolled growth.
This trait is known as lack of contact inhibition.
Normal cells require a solid
substrate (basement membrane) upon which to grow. This is known as
anchorage-dependent growth. Cancer cells are anchorage-independent, growing
in circumstances where they are deprived of substrate.
2.
Altered cellular metabolism. Cancer cells
demonstrate a greatly increased rate of glucose transport. Anaerobic
glycolysis is the predominant energy pathway of cancer cells, even in the
presence of adequate oxygen. This may partly explain the large amount of
metabolic acids produced by cancer cells.
Tumor cells have reduced
growth requirements and will proliferate in culture media (less than 1%
serum) that halt cell growth and division of normal cells.
3.
Vascularization. Tumor cells secrete angiogenic
growth factors which cause non-neoplastic blood vessels to grow from
surrounding normal tissue. Research indicates that associated fibrin
deposits many be necessary for angiogenesis.
(1,2)
4.
Invasion and metastasis. Multiple
characteristics allow for local invasion and distant metastasis.
Cancer cells often secrete
enzymes including collagenase, heparinase and stromolysin which are capable
of degrading basement membrane and allowing invasion of tumor into adjacent
tissues and general circulation.
Inflammation is caused by
cellular substances, high acid cellular waste, and tumor pressure on
adjacent normal tissue which produces histamine, leukotrienes and
prostaglandins of the 2 series, increasing capillary permeability.
Anchorage independence
(discussed above) allows cancer cells to travel through the blood stream
without substrate. Normal cells do not have this ability. Once a clump of
cancerous sells has made its way into general circulation, aggregates of
platelets and/or fibrin encasement may serve as protection from the immune
system.
Cancer cells have affinity
for metastasis to certain and predictable locations not related to obvious
blood flow patterns. Unidentified tissue chemotactic factors or lectin
binding sites may account for this attraction. (3)
5.
Escape from immune surveillance. Carcinogenic
burden may simply overwhelm available immune surveillance, especially in the
immunocompromised host.
Many cancer patients have
apparently intact immune systems, however, and it is felt that cancer cells
may secrete substances which circumvent the host’s immune response. Such
immune-eluding substances include prostaglandins and other inflammatory
substances. Fibrin and platelet aggregation may also serve to assist in
protection from host immune response.
Tumor cells also appear to
escape host immunity by down-regulation of Human Leukocytic Antigen (HLA)
expression. HLA assists lymphocyte recognition of target cells.
Causes of Cancer
Understanding the causes of a particular cancer gives valuable clues to
vulnerabilities and points of attack. Immune system dysfunction has long
been considered a primary cause and point of treatment in alternative cancer
treatment. However, there is significant evidence to suggest that immune
dysfunction is only one of a number of causative factors and certainly NOT
the most important one.
It
appears that very few cancers have a single cause or "initiator." Instead,
most cancers may begin as a series of combination of events that lead to
mutation. Tumor initiation begins when DNA in a cell or population of cells
is damaged by exposure to exogenous or endogenous carcinogens. This alone is
not sufficient to give rise to cancer. Damage at this point can be repaired.
If DNA damage is not repaired or damaged cells eliminated, and if the
microenvironment of the damaged calls are suitable to contribute to cell
growth, then the process continues to the "promotion" phase.
(48,49,50,51,52)
Known
initiators of cancer include:
1.
Genetic factors. A number of genetic factors
may play a role in susceptibility to cancer, although study of this aspect
of malignancy is a newly emerging field. (47) Such genetic
factors include APC/MCC (45,46), RAS, DCC, p53 mutations and/or
allelic losses, hyperexpression of c-MYC and RB genes. (10)
Mutation of the p53 tumor
suppressor gene is the most frequently observed genetic lesion in human
cancer; more than 50% of all human tumors examined to date have identifiable
p53 gene point mutations or deletions. (4,5,6,7,14) While some
p53 gene mutation is heritable, the majority of tumor suppressor gene
mutation appears inducible, primarily by environmental factors.
(8,9,11,12,13,15,16,17)
Although genetics undoubtedly
play a role in susceptibility to cancer, it is estimated that less than 25%
of all cancers are genetically related. (58)
2.
2.) Chronic viral infections. Chronic
infections of Epstein-Barr(EBV) (18,19,20,21,32) ,Human Papilloma
(HPV) (22,23,24,25), Hepatitis C (HCV) (26), Hepatitis
B (HBV) (27), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (28,29,30), human
polyomaviruses JC(JCV) and BK (BKV) (31), and others predispose
to cancer development.
3.
3.) Chronic inflammation.(32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,47)
4.
4.) Toxins, both endogenous and exogenous, can
initiate cancer by causing ROS which in turn damage DNA. A number of
exogenous and endogenous chemicals are considered carcinogenic, although the
rate and degree of internal detoxification, especially phase II liver
enzymes, are an important part of the initiation process. Few substances are
carcinogenic per se without contribution from faulty or under-functioning
internal detoxification systems. (53,54,55,56,57,58,59)
5.
5.) Ionizing radiation. X-rays and other
sources of ionizing radiation are known to cause DNA mutations consistent
with cancer initiation. (60)
Cancer Promoters
DNA
damage alone is usually insufficient to initiate tumor development. If the
DNA damage is repaired or the damaged cell is eliminated, the multi-step
process of cancer development will be thwarted. If, however, mutagenic
damage is not repaired and/or the damaged cell is not eliminated, and if the
cellular environment is conducive to cell growth, then damaged cells can
multiply. This stage is known as "progression" and it is a necessary step
for the development of malignancy. Factors which promote malignant cell
growth include:
1.)
Nutritional deficiencies. Certain vitamins,
minerals, trace minerals and phytonutrients act in a number of ways to
thwart malignant cell promotion. The mechanisms of actions are many and
varied but include ROS inactivation, upregulation of detoxification
pathways, esp. phase II liver enzyme pathways, direct decrease or
neutralization of carcinogenic compounds, and immune system enhancement.
Deficiencies of any one of the nutrients involved in these protective
processes can leave the organism vulnerable to the promotion phase of cancer
development.(61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71)
2.)
Extracellular milieu. Blood glucose, insulin,
cortisol, and arachadonic-derived prostatglandins (especially PGE2) act as
promoters. In hormone-responsive cancers, estrogens, testosterone, prolactin
and sex hormone metabolites and mimickers can also promote cell growth. The
metabolic state of the organism therefore plays a major role in the
promotion of cancer. (72,73,74,75,76,77)
3.)
Inflammation. In addition to being an initiator of cancer, inflammation also
acts to promote cancer in several ways, primarily by altering the
cell-to-cell communication and delaying local detoxification.
(32,33,34,35,37,38,39,40)
Treatment Strategies
Treatment strategies involve interfering with cancer progression at any
phase of development, but initiation and promotion stages present the
greatest opportunity for intervention.
To
prevent the DNA damage which occurs during initiation, steps can be taken to
mitigate sources of mutation, as follows:
I.) Genetic factors. While this aspect of initiation might seem
the hardest to compensate for, it must be remembered that genetic mutation
represents only weakness, not a forgone conclusion that cancer will develop.
Minimizing other predispositions to initiation, such as nutrient
deficiencies and carcinogenic exposure, can be sufficient to overcome
heritable weaknesses. Further, dietary fasting, calorie restriction (CR) or
a ketogenic diet (KD) have been shown to suppress the p53 oncogene,
rendering this most common genetic factor less relevant. (78)
II.) Chronic viral infections. As with genetic factors, the
presence of a chronic viral infection does not, by itself, mean an
initiating certainly. Immune-enhancing strategies, anti-viral therapies and
avoidance of other known initiators may be sufficient to prevent
virally-caused mutagenesis.
III.) Chronic inflammation. Now known as a risk factor for heart
disease, rheumatic disease and cancer, even subtle levels of inflammation,
as measured by an hs-CRP blood test, can elevate risk of initiation.
Fortunately, such inflammatory conditions respond well to nutritional,
botanical and dietary modification. CR and KD have both been shown to reduce
inflammation. Bromelain, curcumin and other anti-cancer drugs are, perhaps
not coincidentally, also potent anti-inflammatory substances.
IV.) Toxins and radiation. Minimization of exposure and optimal
dietary antioxidants can help offset the effects of environmental toxins,
whether chemicals or ionizing radiation. Avoidance of exposure is also an
obvious but often-overlooked preventive measure.
The
Most Potent Anti-Cancer Strategy Known
"Attack by stratagem: hence, to fight and conquer in all your battles is not
supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's
resistance without fighting" ---Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
Nutritional and botanical factors can have profound positive effects in
cancer treatment, either alone or as adjuncts to conventional treatment.
The
single most potent anti-cancer strategy documented in the medical literature
is to strike at the core of cancer's metabolism: anaerobic glycolysis.
Numerous animal and human studies have demonstrated that the glycolytic
pathway of cancer cells can be confounded by the metabolic state of ketosis,
often with profound apoptotic effects on cancer cells but without
consequence to normal cells. In fact, the metabolic state of ketosis may
curtail cancer growth by a number of different mechanisms:
I.) Greatly decreasing the glucose substrate required for cancer
cell metabolism. Most tumors express abnormalities in the number and
function of their mitochondria (80,81,88,89). Such abnormalities
would prevent the bioenergetic utilization of ketone bodies, which require
functional mitochondria for their oxidation.
II.) Decreasing insulin, a secondary growth factor for cancer
cells.
III.) Decreasing inflammation (metabolic ketosis has
anti-inflammatory effects). (85,86,87)
IV.) Decreasing ROS production. (82,83,84)
As one
author pointed out, why would we believe that cells damaged by mutation are
more resilient than normal cells? The answer is: they are not. Malignant
cells are largely incapable of the metabolic flexibility displayed by normal
cells, and therein lies their weakness and the potential for a gentle but
highly effective point of attack.
Ketosis can be achieved by a high fat, moderate protein, low carbohydrate
diet or by a calorie-restricted (CR) diet. Both methods of achieving ketosis
have proven to decrease the production of ROS. Calorie restriction (CR) has
a long history of experimentation in animals where it has also been seen to
increase ROS antioxidant defense systems including superoxide dismutase,
catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. (90)
In
spite of improved availability of foods containing anti-carcinogenic
phytonutrients and vitamins, many types of cancer have not declined as
expected. This correlates to the overall calorie increase and overweight
condition of our society, a condition which puts us in "constant feast" mode
instead of the periodic fasting our ancestors previously experienced.
(91) Many observers feel that our previous occasional fast, which
would induce ketosis, was also beneficial for cancer control. It has also
been hypothesized that some alternative cancer treatments, such as juice
fasting or the use of Coley's toxins, are effective primarily because they
induce metabolic ketosis.
Additional Nutritional and Botanical Interventions
Although virtually any nutrient or herb can be considered in cancer
treatment because of the multiple systems involved in same, only a
relatively small handful of specific nutrients and botanicals have been
well-studied and consistently proven to benefit the cancer patient. We will
confine our discussion to those substances with a long history of use in
human malignancy.
Nutritional Supplementation in the Treatment of Cancer
Supplements of proven utility in cancer treatment include:
I.) Vitamin C: long used for it's dual function of immune
up-regulation and direct toxicity to cancer cells, but doses sufficient to
achieve the cytotoxic effect are unobtainable via the oral route. For this
reason, IV vitamin C should be considered in cancer therapy. (92)
II.) Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol): vitamin D deficiency is a
known risk factor for cancer development.(93) D3 induces
differentiation, inhibits angiogenesis (94, 95,96) and shows
antitumor activity.(97,98,99) It may also up-regulate vitamin A
receptors.(94) Vitamin D3 may serve to prevent metastatic bone
disease in higher doses, perhaps because it is needed for normal
calcification of bone matrix.
III.) Melatonin: a hormone produced by the pituitary gland which
regulates sleep and circadian rhythms. Melatonin is a more potent
antioxidant than glutathione or vitamin E (101). In vitro, it
demonstrates anti-estrogen activity and immune stimulation. (100)
Recent studies show that melatonin inhibits cell proliferation profoundly in
vivo but only weakly in vitro. It is synergistic with IL-2 and increases the
effectiveness of IL-2 treatment. (102)
IV.) CoQ10 (ubiquinone): this vitamin-like compound is involved
in mitochondrial energy production. The heart is a high user of CoQ10 and
many chemotherapeutic drugs deplete body stores of this nutrient. CoQ10 has
been used successfully to reduce chemotherapy-induced cardio toxicity. In
breast cancer patients, a dose of 90mg daily increases late stage survival
dramatically. Three cases of complete remission have been documented at
higher doses (300-400mg) per day. (103)
V.) Selenium: studies show that seleium interferes with the
activity of p53 genes that promote the growth of cancer and induces
apoptosis (104,105,106).
VI.) Tocotrienols: a member of the Vitamin E family,
tocotrienols induce apoptosis and S-phase arrest (107,108) and
inhibit proliferation. (109)
Botanical Considerations in Cancer Treatment
A
HIGHLY SELECTIVE MATERIA MEDICA
Classified by action:
Natural Killer (NK) Cell Activation
Allium sativum
Astragalus
Echinacea spp.
Eleutherococcus senticosus
Panax
ginseng
T-Cell Activation
Allium sativum
Astragalus
Echinacea spp.
Eleutherococcus
Anti-tumerogenic
Allium
sativum
Berberine derivatives:
Hydrastis canadensis
Berberis aquifolia
B.
vulgaris
Curcuma longa
Echinacea spp.
Stimulants of IgG & IgM Production
Panax ginseng
Anti-inflammatory
Ananas comosus
Curcuma longa
Fibrinolytic
Allium sativum
Ananas
comosus
Macrophage Activation
Allium sativum
Aloe
vera
Berberine derivatives:
Hydrastis canadensis
Berberis aquafolia
B. vulgaris
Coumarine derivatives:
Angelica sinensis-dong quai
Meliotus officinalis-sweet clover
Trifolium pratense- red clover
Echinacea spp.
Anti-metastatic
Ananas comosus
Larix
spp.
modified citrus pectin (MCP)
Cytotoxic (IV
administration)
Catharanthus roseus- periwinkle
vinblastin,vincristine,
vindesin,vinorelbine
Podophyllum peltatum-mayapple-podophyllotoxin
Taxus
batacca- English yew- docetaxel
Taxotere®
Taxus
brevifolia- Pacific yew- paclitaxel
Taxol®
Viscum
album-mistletoe- Iscador®]
Materia Medica
Allium sativum (Liliaceae) - Garlic
As a
food and a medicine, garlic comes closest to being a true panacea. Research
has proved garlic's immune-potentiating ability, including activation of NK
and T-cells. (1,2,3,4.) Garlic is fibrinolytic, decreases
platelet aggragation (5,6,7) and has been shown to have direct
anti-tumor effects. 8,9,10. It is also a potent broad-spectrum
antimicrobial, effective against alpha- and beta- Strep., E. coli.,
Klebsiella pneumonia, Mycobacterium, Salmonella, Staph. aureus, and Proteus
spp. (17, 18, 19)
Aloe vera (Liliaceae) - Aloes
Acemannan, a water-soluable polysaccharide in Aloe vera, is a known immuno-stimulant
(27,28) and anti-viral. (29) It's mechanism of
action is thought to be via stimulation of macrophage secretion of Tumor
Necrosis Factor (TNF), interleukon, and interferon.
Ananas comosus (Bromeliaceae) - Pineapple (bromelain)
Bromelain is a sulfur-containing proteolytic enzyme from the stem of the
pineapple plant. Other constituents include a non-proteolytic plasminogen
activator, a peroxidase, and several protease inhibitors. (22,23)
Bromelain possesses significant anti-inflammatory activity by selective
inhibition of pro-inflammatory prostaglandins. (16, 20) It also
possesses fibrinolytic activity secondary to plasminogen activator (21)
which may account for the antimetastatic properties seen in vivo. (24,
25, 26)
Astragalus membranaceus (Leguminosae) - Astragalus, Milk Vetch, Huang QI
Astragalus increases NK and T cell activity (11,12) in both
normal and immunocompromised hosts.(13) It increases interferon
production and is antibiotic against Shigella, Strep., Staph. and
Diplococcus.(15)
Berberine derivatives:
Hydrastis Canadensis - (Ranunculaceae) - Goldenseal
Berberis aquafolia - (Berberidaceae) - Oregon Grape
Berberis vulgaris - (Berberidaceae) - Barberry
Berberine, an alkaloid derivative from various plants, has demonstrated
significant antitumor effects with kill rates of 81% in vivo and 91% in
vitro. This compares favorably to BCNU, a chemotherapeutic agent with a kill
rate of 43% in vitro. (30)
Berberine sulfate also shows macrophage activation and cytostatic activity
against tumor cells in vitro. (31) Berberine is well known for
its broad spectrum antimicrobial activity (32,33,34) which is
most effective in a neutral to alkaline medium. (35)
Courmarin derivatives:
Angelica sinensis - (Umbelliferaceae) - Dong quai
Metolium officinalis - Sweet clover
Trifolium pretense - (Leguminosae) - Red clover
Coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) is a component of several medicinal plants that
have been used historically in the treatment of cancer. Recent research has
shown an immunomodulatory effect through activation of macrophages and
monocytes. (39)
Curcuma longa - (Zingiberaceae) - Turmeric
Curcumin, a major component in turmeric, is a potent antioxidant and
hepatoprotectant. It has been shown to inhibit cancer in all stages of
development (initiation, promotion, and progression), (36) and
provide symptom relief when used topically on external cancers. (37)
Anti-inflammatory effects are believed due to its ability stabilize
lysosomal membranes and uncouple oxidative phosphorylation. At higher doses,
curcumin stimulates endogenous corticoid release. (38)
Echinacea purpura, E. angustifolia (Compositae) - Purple coneflower
Echinacea is one of the most widely studied medicinal herbs, and its immune-potentiating
effects are not in question.
Arabinogalactin, a purified polysaccharide from E. purpura, has been shown
to activate macrophage cytotoxicity to tumor cells, increase interferon
production, stimulate T-lymphocyte production and activity, enhance NK cell
activity and increase levels of circulating neutrophils. (40, 41,
42,43)
Echinacea stimulates non-specific defense mechanisms including alternate
complement pathway. (44) It is anti-tumerogenic in animal
models. (45)
Eleutherococcus senticosis - (Araliaceae) - Siberian ginseng
Eleutherococcus has been shown to both elevate numbers and activate helper /
inducer lymphocytes and NK cells. (46)
It has
been revered in Russia as an adaptogen, and studies confirm that it
normalizes numerous physical functions regardless of the direction of
imbalance. (47)
Larix occidentalis, L. dahurica - (Pinaceae) - Larch
Larch
is a deciduous conifer that contains an arabinogalactan similar to that in
other "immune enhancing" herbs including Echinacea spp., Baptisia tinctora,
and Curcuma longa.
Larch
arabinogalactans have been shown to reduce the number of liver metastasis in
multiple studies (48,49,50,51), perhaps by acting as a "reverse
lectin" and blocking tumor binding sites. (52) A similar effect
has been noted for Modified Citrus Pectin (MCP). (See below)
Panax ginseng - (Araliaceae) - Chinese or Korean ginseng
Ginsenosides, an active constituent in P. ginseng, have been shown to
increase both the number and the activity of lymphocytes in healthy
subjects. (53)
Large
doses in lab animals (human equivalent of 500 -125,000 mg) for five days
increased IgG and IgM formation by 50 and 100% respectively, and enhanced NK
cell activity and interferon production. (54)
Ginseng has long been considered an adaptogenic herb, and recent research
verifies that it increases resistance to physical and chemical stress.
(55,56)
Modified Citrus Pectin (MCP)
Pectin, a high molecular-weight polysaccharide present in the cell wall of
all plants, can be pH degraded to produce a modified (smaller)
polysaccharide with anti-metastatic capabilities. (57) MCP
appears to bind with galectins on cancer cell surfaces, inhibiting
aggregation and adherence to normal cells (58) and offering anti-metastatic
protection in animal models. (59,60,61)
In Summary
Much
more is known about the management of cancer, including how to evoke durable
remissions and even cure, than is generally used or discussed in
conventional medicine. Perhaps this is because some of the most powerful and
proven therapies do not require drugs or invasive intervention.
"Those who battle nature as their enemy will lose; those who use nature to
battle their enemy will win." ---Mark Ziemann, R.N.
References:
1.) Kandil O.M., et al.: Garlic and the immune system in
humans: its effect on natural killer cells. Fed Proc 46:441, 1987.
2.) Morioka, N., Morton, D.L., and Irie, R.F.: A protein
fraction from aged garlic extract enhances cytotoxicity and proliferation of
human lymphocytes mediated by interleukin-2 and conavalin. Proc Ann Meet Am
Assoc Cancer 34:A3297, 1993.
3.) Lau, B.H., Yamasaki, T., and Gridley, D.S.: Garlic
compounds modulate macrophage and T-lymphocyte function. Mol Biother
3:103-107, 1991.
4.)
Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC. p53 mutations in human
cancers. Science 1991;253:49-53.
5.)
Law JC, Whiteside TL, Gollin SM, Weissfeld J, El-Ashmawy L, Srivastava S,
Landreneau RJ, Johnson JT, Ferrell RE.: Variation of p53 mutational spectra
between carcinoma of the upper and lower respiratory tract. Clin Cancer
Res. 1995 Jul;1(7):763-8.
6.)
Harris CC: 1995 Deichmann Lecture--p53 tumor suppressor gene: at the
crossroads of molecular carcinogenesis, molecular epidemiology and cancer
risk assessment. Toxicol Lett. 1995 Dec;82-83:1-7.
7.)
Kohler MF, Marks JR, Wiseman RW, Jacobs IJ, Davidoff AM, Clarke-Pearson DL,
Soper JT, Bast RC Jr, Berchuck A.: Spectrum of mutation and frequency of
allelic deletion of the p53 gene in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst.
1993 Sep 15;85(18):1513-9.
8.)
Puisieux A, Lim S, Groopman J, Ozturk M.: Selective targeting of p53 gene
mutational hotspots in human cancers by etiologically defined carcinogens.
Cancer Res. 1991 Nov 15;51(22):6185-9.
9.)
Lasky T, Silbergeld E.:P53 mutations associated with breast, colorectal,
liver, lung, and ovarian cancers. Environ Health Perspect. 1996
Dec;104(12):1324-31.
10.)
Karakosta A, Golias Ch, Charalabopoulos A, Peschos D, Batistatou A,
Charalabopoulos K.: Genetic models of human cancer as a multistep process.
Paradigm models of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and chronic myelogenous
and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005
Dec;24(4):505-14.
11.)
Sakaguchi S, Yokokawa Y, Hou J, Zhang XL, Li XP, Li SS, Li XX, Zhu DC,
Kamijima M, Yamanoshita O, Nakajima T.: Environmental exposure and p53
mutations in esophageal cancer patients in areas of low and high incidence
of esophageal cancer in China. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005 Dec;207(4):313-24.
12.)
Van Vleet TR, Watterson TL, Klein PJ, Coulombe RA Jr.: Aflatoxin B1 alters
the expression of p53 in cytochrome P450-expressing human lung cells.Toxicol
Sci. 2006 Feb;89(2):399-407. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
13.)
Hong HH, Dunnick J, Herbert R, Devereux TR, Kim Y, Sills RC.: Genetic
alterations in K-ras and p53 cancer genes in lung neoplasms from Swiss
(CD-1) male mice exposed transplacentally to AZT. Environ Mol Mutagen.
2006 Jan 4; [Epub ahead of print]
14.)
Le Roux E, Gormally E, Hainaut P.: Somatic mutations in human cancer:
applications in molecular epidemiology. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique.
2005 Jun;53(3):257-66.
15.)
Ohgaki H, Kleihues P.: Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas. Acta
Neuropathol (Berl). 2005 Jan;109(1):93-108. Epub 2005 Feb 1.
16.)
Schroeder JC, Conway K, Li Y, Mistry K, Bell DA, Taylor JA.: p53 mutations
in bladder cancer: evidence for exogenous versus endogenous risk factors.
Cancer Res. 2003 Nov 1;63(21):7530-8.
17.)
Gao WM, Romkes M, Day RD, Siegfried JM, Luketich JD, Mady HH, Melhem MF,
Keohavong P. Association of the DNA repair gene XPD Asp312Asn polymorphism
with p53 gene mutations in tobacco-related non-small cell lung cancer.
Carcinogenesis. 2003 Oct;24(10):1671-6. Epub 2003 Jul 4.
18.)
Foster AE, Rooney CM.: Improving T cell therapy for cancer. Expert Opin
Biol Ther. 2006 Mar;6(3):215-29.
19.)
Dutta N, Gupta A, Mazumder DN, Banerjee S. Down-regulation of locus-specific
human lymphocyte antigen class I expression in Epstein-Barr virus-associated
gastric cancer: implication for viral-induced immune evasion. Cancer.
2006 Apr 15;106(8):1685-93.
20.)
Luo B, Wang Y, Wang XF, Gao Y, Huang BH, Zhao P.: Correlation of
Epstein-Barr virus and its encoded proteins with Helicobacter pylori and
expression of c-met and c-myc in gastric carcinoma. World J
Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar 28;12(12):1842-8.
21.)
Ng MH, Chan KH, Ng SP, Zong YS.: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane
protein-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes targeting EBV-carrying natural
killer cell malignancies. Eur J Immunol. 2006 Mar;36(3):593-602.
22.)Doorbar
J. Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2006 May;110(5):525-41.
23.)Castellsague
X, Diaz M, de Sanjose S, Munoz N, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Peeling RW,
Ashley R, Smith JS, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, Bosch FX; International Agency
for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group: Worldwide
human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors:
implications for screening and prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Mar
1;98(5):303-15.
24.)Karagas
MR, Nelson HH, Sehr P, Waterboer T, Stukel TA, Andrew A, Green AC, Bavinck
JN, Perry A, Spencer S, Rees JR, Mott LA, Pawlita M. Human papillomavirus
infection and incidence of squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas of the
skin. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Mar 15;98(6):389-95.
25.)Zhao
X, Rasmussen S, Perry J, Kiev J.The human papillomavirus as a possible cause
of squamous cell carcinoma: a case study with a review of the medical
literature. Am Surg. 2006 Jan;72(1):49-50.
26.)
Yao F, Terrault N.: Hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Treat
Options Oncol. 2001 Dec;2(6):473-83.
27.)
Wong ET, Chew YP, Lee LA, Lee CG.: Therapeutic strategies for hepatitis B
virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Drug Targets. 2002
Oct;3(5):369-78.
28.)Soderberg-Naucler
C. Does cytomegalovirus play a causative role in the development of various
inflammatory diseases and cancer? J Intern Med. 2006 Mar;259(3):219-46.
29.)
Koch S, Solana R, Rosa OD, Pawelec G. Human cytomegalovirus infection and T
cell immunosenescence: A mini review. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006 Feb 28; [Epub
ahead of print]
30.)Pawelec
G, Koch S, Gouttefangeas C, Wikby A. Immunorejuvenation in the elderly.
Rejuvenation Res. 2006 Spring;9(1):111-6.
31.)Rollison
DE, Engels EA, Halsey NA, Shah KV, Viscidi RP, Helzlsouer KJ.: Prediagnostic
circulating antibodies to JC and BK human polyomaviruses and risk of
non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006
Mar;15(3):543-50.
32.)
Khan G.: Epstein-Barr virus, cytokines, and inflammation: A cocktail for the
pathogenesis of Hodgkin's lymphoma? Exp Hematol. 2006 Apr;34(4):399-406.
33.)Dalgleish
AG, O'Byrne K. Inflammation and cancer: the role of the immune response and
angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res. 2006;130:1-38.
34.)Schottelius
AJ, Dinter H.: Cytokines, NF-kappaB, microenvironment, intestinal
inflammation and cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2006;130:67-87.
35.)Otani
T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Tsugane S.: Plasma C-reactive protein and
risk of colorectal cancer in a nested case-control study: Japan public
health center-based prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.
2006 Apr;15(4):690-5.
36.)Ernst
P.: The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Mar;13 Suppl 1:13-8
37.)Dobrovolskaia
MA, Kozlov SV.: Inflammation and cancer: when NF-kappaB amalgamates the
perilous partnership.Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2005 Aug;5(5):325-44.
38.)
Naldini A, Carraro F.: Role of inflammatory mediators in angiogenesis.
Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005 Feb;4(1):3-8.
39.)Ohshima
H, Tazawa H, Sylla BS, Sawa T.: Prevention of human cancer by modulation of
chronic inflammatory processes. Mutat Res. 2005 Dec 11;591(1-2):110-22.
Epub 2005 Aug 3.
40.)Coussens
LM, Werb Z.: Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002 Dec
19-26;420(6917):860-7.
41.)Chung
LW, Baseman A, Assikis V, Zhau HE.: Molecular insights into prostate cancer
progression: the missing link of tumor microenvironment. J Urol. 2005
Jan;173(1):10-20.
42.)Wang
X, Wang E, Kavanagh JJ, Freedman RS.: Ovarian cancer, the coagulation
pathway, and inflammation. J Transl Med. 2005 Jun 21;3:25.
43.)Dempke
W, Rie C, Grothey A, Schmoll HJ.: Cyclooxygenase-2: a novel target for
cancer chemotherapy? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001 Jul;127(7):411-7.
44.)Jackson
L, Evers BM.: Chronic inflammation and pathogenesis of GI and pancreatic
cancers. Cancer Treat Res. 2006;130:39-65.
45.)Sanz-Ortega
J, Sanz-Esponera J, Caldes T, Gomez de la Concha E, Sobel ME, Merino MJ. LOH
at the APC/MCC gene (5Q21) in gastric cancer and preneoplastic lesions.
Prognostic implications. Pathol Res Pract. 1996 Dec;192(12):1206-10.
46.)Fang
DC, Jass JR, Wang DX, Zhou XD, Luo YH, Young J. Infrequent loss of
heterozygosity of APC/MCC and DCC genes in gastric cancer showing DNA
microsatellite instability. J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jul;52(7):504-8.
47.) de Visser K, Eichten A., Coussens L.,: Paradoxical roles
of the immune system during cancer development. Nature Reviews Cancer 6,
24-37 (January 2006).
48.)
Stephen D. Hursting, Thomas J. Slaga, Susan M. Fischer, John DiGiovanni,
James M. Phang: Mechanism-Based Cancer Prevention Approaches: Targets,
Examples, and the Use of Transgenic Mice. Journal of the National Cancer
Institute, Vol. 91, No. 3, 215-225, February 3, 1999.
49.) Slaga TJ. Mechanisms involved in two-stage
carcinogenesis in mouse skin. In: Slaga TJ, editor. Mechanisms of tumor
promotion. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1984. p. 1-93.
50.)
Sugimura T.: Multistep carcinogenesis: a 1992 perspective. Science. 1992
Oct 23;258(5082):603-7.
51.)
Guengerich FP.: Metabolic activation of carcinogens. Pharmacol Ther.
1992;54(1):17-61.
52.)
IB Weinstein: The origins of human cancer: molecular mechanisms of
carcinogenesis and their implications for cancer prevention and
treatment--twenty-seventh G.H.A. Clowes memorial award lecture. Cancer
Research, Vol 48, Issue 15 4135-4143.
53.)Rydlova
H, Miksanova M, Ryslava H, Stiborova M.: Carcinogenic pollutants o-nitroanisole
and o-anisidine are substrates and inducers of cytochromes P450.Biomed
Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005 Dec;149(2):441-7.
54.)Luersen
L, Wellner T, Koch HM, Angerer J, Drexler H, Korinth G.: Penetration of
beta-naphthylamine and o-toluidine through human skin in vitro. Arch
Toxicol. 2006 Apr 5; [Epub ahead of print].
55.)Paustenbach DJ, Fehling K, Scott P, Harris M, Kerger
BD.:Identifying soil cleanup criteria for dioxins in urban residential
soils: how have 20 years of research and risk assessment experience affected
the analysis? J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2006 Mar-Apr;9(2):87-145.
56.)
Zahid M, Kohli E, Saeed M, Rogan E, Cavalieri E.: The greater reactivity of
estradiol-3,4-quinone vs estradiol-2,3-quinone with DNA in the formation of
depurinating adducts: implications for tumor-initiating activity. Chem
Res Toxicol. 2006 Jan;19(1):164-72.
57.) Perchellet JP, Perchellet EM, Gali HU, Gao XM. Oxidant
stress and multistage carcinogenesis. In: Mukhtar H, editor. Skin cancer:
mechanisms and human relevance. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995. p. 145-80.
58.)
Foundations of Wellness, U.C. Berkley Wellness Newsletter, April 2006.
59.)Bounias
M.: Etiological factors and mechanism involved in relationships between
pesticide exposure and cancer. J Environ Biol. 2003 Jan;24(1):1-8.
60.) JE Moulder: Power-frequency fields and cancer. Crit Rev
Biomed Eng 26:1-116, 1998.
61.)Grubben
MJ, van den Braak CC, Nagengast FM, Peters WH.: Low colonic glutathione
detoxification capacity in patients at risk for colon cancer. Eur J Clin
Invest. 2006 Mar;36(3):188-92.
62.)Davenport
DM, Wargovich MJ.: Modulation of cytochrome P450 enzymes by organosulfur
compounds from garlic. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Dec;43(12):1753-62.
63.)Yang
P, Ebbert JO, Sun Z, Weinshilboum RM.: Role of the glutathione metabolic
pathway in lung cancer treatment and prognosis: a review. J Clin Oncol.
2006 Apr 10;24(11):1761-9.
64.)Grandics
P.: Cancer: a single disease with a multitude of manifestions? J
Carcinog. 2003 Nov 18;2(1):9.
65.)Ahluwalia
N.: Aging, nutrition and immune function. J Nutr Health Aging.
2004;8(1):2-6.
66.)Campbell
SE, Stone WL, Lee S, Whaley S, Yang H, Qui M, Goforth P, Sherman D, McHaffie
D, Krishnan K.: Comparative effects of RRR-alpha- and RRR-gamma-tocopherol
on proliferation and apoptosis in human colon cancer cell lines. BMC
Cancer. 2006 Jan 17;6:13.
67.)Chen
C, Kong AN.: Dietary cancer-chemopreventive compounds: from signaling and
gene expression to pharmacological effects. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005
Jun;26(6):318-26.
68.)
Mehta R, Laver GW, Stapley R, McMullen E.: Liver DNA adducts in
methyl-deficient rats administered a single dose of aflatoxin B1.
Carcinogenesis. 1992 Jul;13(7):1241-7.
69.)
Ghoshal AK, Farber E.: Choline deficiency, lipotrope deficiency and the
development of liver disease including liver cancer: a new perspective.
Lab Invest. 1993 Mar;68(3):255-60.
70.)Tuohimaa
P, Lyakhovich A, Aksenov N, Pennanen P, Syvala H, Lou YR, Ahonen M, Hasan T,
Pasanen P, Blauer M, Manninen T, Miettinen S, Vilja P, Ylikomi T.: Vitamin D
and prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2001
Jan-Mar;76(1-5):125-34.
71.)Ryan
BM, Weir DG.: Relevance of folate metabolism in the pathogenesis of
colorectal cancer. J Lab Clin Med. 2001 Sep;138(3):164-76.
72.)Rapp
K, Schroeder J, Klenk J, Ulmer H, Concin H, Diem G, Oberaigner W, Weiland
SK.Fasting blood glucose and cancer risk in a cohort of more than 140,000
adults in Austria. Diabetologia. 2006 Mar 24; [Epub ahead of print]
73.)Beck
SA, Tisdale MJ. Effect of insulin on weight loss and tumour growth in
acachexia model.Br J Cancer. 1989 May;59(5):677-81
74.)
Fearon KC.: Nutritional pharmacology in the treatment of neoplastic disease.
Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1988 Oct;2(4):941-9.
75.)
Bauer M, Hamm AC, Bonaus M, Jacob A, Jaekel J, Schorle H, Pankratz MJ,
Katzenberger JD.: Starvation response in mouse liver shows strong
correlation with life-span-prolonging processes. Physiol Genomics. 2004
Apr 13;17(2):230-44.
76.)
Morita T, Tabata S, Mineshita M, Mizoue T, Moore MA, Kono S.: The metabolic
syndrome is associated with increased risk of colorectal adenoma
development: the Self-Defense Forces health study. Asian Pac J Cancer
Prev. 2005 Oct-Dec;6(4):485-9.
77.)
Tabuchi M, Kitayama J, Nagawa H.: Hypertriglyceridemia is positively
correlated with the development of colorectal tubular adenoma in Japanese
men. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 28;12(8):1261-4.
78.)
Berrigan D, Perkins SN, Haines DC, Hursting SD.: Adult-onset calorie
restriction and fasting delay spontaneous tumorigenesis in p53-deficient
mice. Carcinogenesis. 2002 May;23(5):817-22.
79.)Stopper
H, Schinzel R, Sebekova K, Heidland A.: Genotoxicity of advanced glycation
end products in mammalian cells. Cancer Lett. 2003 Feb 20;190(2):151-6.
80.)
Meixensberger J, Herting B, Roggendorf W, Reichmann H: Metabolic patterns in
malignant gliomas.J Neurooncol 1995, 24:153-161
81.)
Pedersen PL: Tumor mitochondria and the bioenergetics of cancer cells.
Prog Exp Tumor Res 1978, 22:190-274.
82.) Veech RL: The therapeutic implications of ketone bodies:
the effects of ketone bodies in pathological conditions: ketosis, ketogenic
diet, redox states, insulin resistance, and mitochondrial metabolism.
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2004, 70:309-319.
83.)
Veech RL: Metabolic control analysis of ketone and insulin action:
Implications for phenotyping of disease and design of therapy.Lecture:
The Dynamic and Energetic Basis of Health and Aging Monday, Nov 11 -
Wednesday, Nov 13, 2002, The Cloister's, NIH, Bethesda MD
84.)
Masuda R, Monahan JW, Kashiwaya Y: D-beta-hydroxybutyrate is neuroprotective
against hypoxia in serum-free hippocampal primary cultures. J Neurosci
Res 2005, 80:501-509.
85.)
Stewart JW, Koehler K, Jackson W, Hawley J, Wang W, Au A, Myers R, Birt DF:
Prevention of mouse skin tumor promotion by dietary energy restriction
requires an intact adrenal gland and glucocorticoid supplementation restores
inhibition.Carcinogenesis 2005, 26:1077-1084
86.)
Zhu Z, Jiang W, Thompson HJ: Mechanisms by which energy restriction inhibits
rat mammary carcinogenesis: in vivo effects of corticosterone on cell cycle
machinery in mammary carcinomas. Carcinogenesis 2003, 24:1225-1231.
87.)
Patel NV, Finch CE: The glucocorticoid paradox of caloric restriction in
slowing brain aging.Neurobiol Aging 2002, 23:707-717.
88.)
Seyfried TN, Sanderson TM, El-Abbadi MM, McGowan R, Mukherjee P.: Role of
glucose and ketone bodies in the metabolic control of experimental brain
cancer.Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1375-82.
89.)
Fearon KC.: Nutritional pharmacology in the treatment of neoplastic
disease.Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1988 Oct;2(4):941-9.
90.) Weindruch R, Walford RL, editors. The retardation of
aging and disease by dietary restriction. Springfield (IL): C. Thomas; 1988.
p. 1-291
91.)
Wargovich MJ, Cunningham JE.:Diet, individual responsiveness and cancer
prevention. J Nutr. 2003 Jul;133(7 Suppl):2400S-2403S.
92.)Padayatty
SJ, Riordan HD, Hewitt SM, Katz A, Hoffer LJ, Levine M.: Intravenously
administered vitamin C as cancer therapy: three cases.CMAJ. 2006 Mar
28;174(7):937-42.
93.)Holick
MF.: Vitamin D: Its role in cancer prevention and treatment. Prog
Biophys Mol Biol. 2006 Mar 10; [Epub ahead of print]
94.)
Majewski S, Skopinska M, Marczak M, Szmurlo A, Bollag W, Jablonska S.:
Vitamin D3 is a potent inhibitor of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis. J
Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 1996 Apr;1(1):97-101.
95.)
Majewski S, Szmurlo A, Marczak M, Jablonska S, Bollag W.: Synergistic effect
of retinoids and interferon alpha on tumor-induced angiogenesis: anti-angiogenic
effect on HPV-harboring tumor-cell lines.Int J Cancer. 1994 Apr
1;57(1):81-5.
96.)
Majewski S, Szmurlo A, Marczak M, Jablonska S, Bollag W.: Inhibition of
tumor cell-induced angiogenesis by retinoids, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and
their combination.Cancer Lett. 1993 Nov 30;75(1):35-9.
97.)
Wietrzyk J, Pelczynska M, Madej J, Dzimira S, Kusnierczyk H, Kutner A,
Szelejewski W, Opolski A.: Toxicity and antineoplastic effect of
(24R)-1,24-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (PRI-2191).Steroids. 2004
Sep;69(10):629-35.
98.)
Vegesna V, O'Kelly J, Said J, Uskokovic M, Binderup L, Koeffle HP.: Ability
of potent vitamin D3 analogs to inhibit growth of prostate cancer cells in
vivo. Anticancer Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;23(1A):283-9.
99.)
Schwartz GG, Eads D, Rao A, Cramer SD, Willingham MC, Chen TC, Jamieson DP,
Wang L, Burnstein KL, Holick MF, Koumenis C.:Pancreatic cancer cells express
25-hydroxyvitamin D-1 alpha-hydroxylase and their proliferation is inhibited
by the prohormone 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.Carcinogenesis. 2004
Jun;25(6):1015-26. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
100.)
Reiter RJ, Melchiorri D, Sewerynek E, Poeggeler B, Barlow-Walden L, Chuang
J, Ortiz GG, Acuna-Castroviejo D.: A review of the evidence supporting
melatonin's role as an antioxidant.J Pineal Res. 1995 Jan;18(1):1-11.
101.)
Hill SM, Spriggs LL, Simon MA, Muraoka H, Blask DE.:The growth inhibitory
action of melatonin on human breast cancer cells is linked to the estrogen
response system. Cancer Lett. 1992 Jul 10;64(3):249-56.
102.)
Lissoni P, Barni S, Cazzaniga M, Ardizzoia A, Rovelli F, Brivio F, Tancini
G.: Efficacy of the concomitant administration of the pineal hormone
melatonin in cancer immunotherapy with low-dose IL-2 in patients with
advanced solid tumors who had progressed on IL-2 alone.Oncology. 1994
Jul-Aug;51(4):344-7.
103.) Boik, John: Cnacer and Natural Medicine, Oregon Medical
Press, 1995,p.71.
104.)
Drake EN.: Cancer chemoprevention: Selenium as a prooxidant, not an
antioxidant. Med Hypotheses. 2006 Mar 28; [Epub ahead of print]
105.)
Zhao R, Xiang N, Domann FE, Zhong W.: Expression of p53 enhances selenite-induced
superoxide production and apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells.Cancer
Res. 2006 Feb 15;66(4):2296-304.
106.)
Sieber F, Daziano JP, Gunther WH, Krieg M, Miyagi K, Sampson RW, Ostrowski
MD, Anderson GS, Tsujino I, Bula RJ.: ELEMENTAL SELENIUM GENERATED BY THE
PHOTOBLEACHING OF SELENOMEROCYANINE PHOTOSENSITIZERS FORMS CONJUGATES WITH
SERUM MACROMOLECULES THAT ARE TOXIC TO TUMOR CELLS.Phosphorus Sulfur
Silicon Relat Elem. 2005;180(3-4):647-657.
107.)
Wada S, Satomi Y, Murakoshi M, Noguchi N, Yoshikawa T, Nishino H.: Tumor
suppressive effects of tocotrienol in vivo and in vitro.Cancer Lett.
2005 Nov 18;229(2):181-91. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
108.)
Sylvester PW, Shah SJ, Samant GV.: Intracellular signaling mechanisms
mediating the antiproliferative and poptotic effects of gamma-tocotrienol in
neoplastic mammary epithelial cells.J Plant Physiol. 2005
Jul;162(7):803-10
109.)
Shah SJ, Sylvester PW.: Gamma-tocotrienol inhibits neoplastic mammary
epithelial cell proliferation by decreasing Akt and nuclear factor kappaB
activity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2005 Apr;230(4):235-41.
Materia Medica
References:
1.)
Kandil O.M., et al.: Garlic and the immune system in humans: its effect on
natural killer cells. Fed Proc 46:441, 1987.
2.)
Morioka, N., Morton, D.L., and Irie, R.F.: A protein fraction from aged
garlic extract enhances cytotoxicity and proliferation of human lymphocytes
mediated by interleukin-2 and conavalin. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer
34:A3297, 1993.
3.)
Lau, B.H., Yamasaki, T., and Gridley, D.S.: Garlic compounds modulate
macrophage and T-lymphocyte function. Mol Biother 3:103-107, 1991. 4.)
Kandil, O.M. et. al.: Garlic and the immune system in humans: Its effect on
natural killer cells. Fed Proc 46:441, 1987.
5.)
Legnani C., Frascaro M., Guazzaloca G., et al.: Effects of a dried garlic
preparation on fibrinolysis and platelet aggragation in healthy subjects.
Arzneim Forsch Drug Res 43:119-122, 1993.
6.)
Kiesewetter H., et al.: effects of garlic coated tablets in peripheral
arterial occlusive disease. Clin Investig 71:383-86, 1993.
7.)
Orekhov, A.N., et al.: Direct anti-atherosclerotic related effects of
garlic. Ann Med 27:63-65, 1995.
8.)
Belman S.: Onion and garlic oils prohibit tumor promotion. Carcinogenesis
4(8):1063-5, 1983.
9.)
Dausch JG., Nixon DW.: Garlic: a review of its relationship to malignant
disease. Prev Med 19:346-61, 1990.
10.)
Kroning, F.: Garlic as an inhibitor for spontaneous tumors in predisposed
mice. Acta Unio Inter Contra Cancrum 20(3):855, 1964.
11.)
Yang, Y.Z., et al.: Effect of Astragalus membranaceus on natural killer cell
activity and induction with coxsacke B viral myocarditis. Chin Med J
103:304-7, 1990.
12.)
Zhao,K.S., Manici, C., and Doria, G.: Enhancement of the immune response in
mice by Astragalus membranaceus. Immunopharmacol 20:225-33, 1990.
13.)
Chu, D.T., et al.: Immunotherapy with Chinese medicinal herbs, I: Immune
restoration of local xenogenic graft-versus-host reaction in cancer patients
by fractionated Astragalus membranaceus in vitro. J Clin Lab Immunol
25:119-123, 1988.
15.)
Yunde, H., Guoling, M., Shuhua, W., et al.: Effect of radix Astragalus
seuhedysari on the interferon system. Chin Med J 94:35-40, 1981.
16.)
Taussig,S.: The mechanism of the physiological action of bromelain. Med
Hypothesis 6:99-104, 1980.
17.)
Sharma, V.D., et al.: Antibacterial properties of Allium sativum Linn.: In
vivo and in vitro studies. Ind J Exp Biol 15:466-468, 1977.
18.)
Cavallito, C.J., and Bailey, J.H.: Allicin, the antibacterial principal in
Allium sativum, I: Isolation, physical properties, and antibacterial action.
J Am Chem Soc 66:1950-51,1944.
19.)
Elnima, E.I. et al.: The antimicrobial activity of garlic and onion
extracts. Pharmazie 38:747-48, 1983.
20.)
Taussig, S., Batkin, S.: Bromelain, the enzyme complex of pineapple (Ananas
comosus) and its clinical application. An update. J Ethnopharm 22:191-203,
1988.
21.)
Felton, G.E.: Fibrinolytic and antithrombotic action of bromelain may
eliminate thrombosis in heart patients. Med Hypothesis, 6: 1123-33, 1980.
22.)
Felton, G.E.: Does kinin released by pineapple stem bromelain stimulate
production of prostaglandin E1-like compounds? Hawaii Med J 36:39-47, 1977.
23.)
Taussig SJ.: The mechanism of the physiological action of bromelain. Med
Hypothesis 6:99-104, 1980.
24.)
Batkin, S., et al.: Modulation of pulmonary metastasis (Lewis lung
carcinoma) by bromelain, an extract of the pineapple stam (Ananas comosus).
Letter. Cancer Invest 6(2):241-242, 1988.
25.)
Goldstein N., et al.: Bromelain as a skin cancer preventive in hairless
mice. Hawaii Med J, 34:91-4, 1975.
26.)
Gerard G., Therapeutique anti-cancreuse et bromelaines. Agressologie
3:261-274, 1972. (In French).
27.)
Sheets, MA., Unger, BA., Giggleman GF Jr., Tizard, IR.: Studies of the
effect of acemannan on retrovirus infections: Clinical stabilization of
feline leukemia virus-infected cats. Mol Biother 3(1):41-45, 1991.
28.)
Peng, SY., Norman J., Curtin G., et al.: Decreased mortality of Norman
murine sarcoma in mice treated with the immunomodulator, acemannan. Mol
Biother 3(2): 79-87, 1991.
29.)
Kahlon, J.B., et al.: In vitro evaluation of the synergistic antiviral
effects of acemannan in combination with azidothymidine and acyclovir. Mol
Biother 3:214-23, 1991.
30.)
Rong-xun Z., et al.: Laboratory studies of berberine used alone and in
combination with 1,3bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosurea to treat malignant
brain tumors. Chinese Med J 103(8):658-65, 1990.
31.)
Kumazawa Y., et al.: Activation of peritoneal macrophages by berberine-type
alkaloids in terms of induction of cytostatic activity. Int J
Immunopharmacol 6(6):587-92, 1984.
32.)
Hahn, F.E., Ciak, J.: Berberine. Antibiotics 3:577-88, 1976.
33.)
Ghosh, A.K.: effect of berberine chloride on leishmania donovani. Ind J Med
Res 78:407-16, 1983.
34.)
Subbaiah, T.V., Amin, A.H.: Effect of berberine sulfate on E. histolytica.
Nature 215:527-28, 1967.
35.)
Amin, A.H., Subbaiah, T.V., and Abbasi, K.M.: Berberine sulfate:
Antimicrobial activity, bioassay, and mode of action. Can J Microbiol
15:1067-76. 1969.
36.)
Nagabhushan, M., Bhide, SV.: Curcumin as an inhibitor of cancer. J Am Col
Nutr 11(2):192-8, 1992.
37.)
Kuttan, R., Sudheeran PC., Josep CD.: Turmeric and curcumin as topical
agents in cancer therapy. Tumori (Italy) 73:29-31, 1987.
38.)
Srivastava R, Srimal, RC.: Modification of certain inflammation-induced
biochemical changes by curcumin. Ind J Med Res 81:215-223, 1985.
40.)
Luettig, B., et al.: Macrophage activation by the polysaccharide
arabinogalactan isolated from plant cell cultures of Echinacea purpurea. J
Natl Cancer Inst 81(9):669-75, 1989.
41.)
Wagner, V.., Proksch, A., Zeitschrift Feur Agnewande Phytotherapie (German)
2(5):166-168, 171, 1981.
42.)
Wagner, V., Proksch,A., Riess-Maurer,I., et al.: Immunostimulatin
polysaccharides (heteroglycane) of higher plants: Preliminary
communications. Arzneim Forsch 34:659-60, 1984.
43.)
Mose, J.: Effect of echinacin on phagocytosis and natural killer cells. Med
Welt 34:1463-67,1983.
44.)
Vomel,V.: Influence of a non-specific immune stimulant on phagocytosis of
erythrocytes and ink by the reticuloendothelial system of isolated perfused
rat livers of different ages. Arzneim Forsch 34:691-95, 1984.
45.)
Bauer, R., Jurcic, K., Puhlmann,J., Wagner, H.: Immunological in vivo and in
vitro examinations of Echinacea extracts. Arzneim Forsch 38:276-281, 1988.
46.)
Bohn,B., Nebe, C.T., Birr, C.: Flow-cytometric studies with Eleutherococcus
senticosus extracts as an immunomodulatory agent. Arzneim-Forsch 37:1193-96,
1987.
47.)
Pizzorno, J.E., Murray, M.T.: Eleutherococcus senticosus: A Textbook of
Natural Medicine, Bastyr University Publications, Seattle, WA, 1995.
48.)
Hagmar, B., Ryd, W., Skomedal, H.: Arabinogalactan blockade of experimental
metastasis to liver by murine hepatoma. Invasion Metastasis 11(6):348-55,
1991.
49.)
Uhlenbruck G., Beuth J., Roszkowski W., et al.: Prevention of experimental
liver metastasis by arabinogalactan. Naturwissenschaften 73(10)626-7, Oct.
1986.
50.)
Beuth J., Ko HL., Oette K., et al.: Inhibition of liver metastasis in mice
by blocking hepatocyte lectins with arabinogalactan infusions and D-galactose.
J cancer Res Clin Oncol 113(1): 51-5,1987.
51.)
Beuth J., Ko HL., et al.: Inhibition of liver tumor cell colonization in two
animal tumor models by lectin blocking with D-galactose or arabinogalacan.
Clin Exp Metastasis 6(2):115-20, Mar-Apr 1988.
52.)
D'Adamo, P.: Larch arabinogalactan. J Nat Med 6(1):33-36, 1996.
53.)
Scaglione, F., et al.: Immunomodulatory effects of two extracts of Panax
ginseng. Drugs Exp Clin Res 16:537-42, 1990.
54.)
Jie, Y.H., Cammisuli,S., Baggiolini, M.: Immunomodulatory effects of Panax
ginseng C.A. Meyer in the mouse. Agents Actions 15: 386-91, 1984.
55.)
Bahrke M.S., Morgan W.P.: Evaluation of the ergogenic properties of ginseng.
Sports Med 18: 229-48, 1994.
56.)
Brekhman I., Dardymov I.V.: Pharmacological investigation of glycosides from
ginseng and eleutherococcus. Lloydia 32:46-51, 1969.
57.)
Kidd, P.M.: A new approach to metastatic cancer prevention: modified citrus
pectin (MCP), a unique pectin that blocks cell surface lectins. Alt Med Rev
1(1): 4-10, 1996.
58.)
Sharon N., Lis H.: Lectins as cell recognition molecules. Science
246:227-34, 1989.
59.)
Platt D., Raz A.: Modulation of the lung colonization of B16-F1 melanoma
cells by citrus pectin. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:438-442, 1992.
60.)
Pienta KJ., et al.: Inhibition of spontaneous metastasis in a rat prostate
cancer model by oral administration of modified citrus pectin. J Natl Cancer
Inst 87:348-53, 1995.
61.)
Raz, A., Lotan R.: Endogenous galactoside-binding lectins: a new class of
functional cell surface molecules related to metastasis. Cancer Metastasis
Rev 6:433-52, 1987.
|